<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Staralicious &#187; hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.staralicious.com/tag/hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.staralicious.com</link>
	<description>News Doesn&#039;t Have To Be Boring</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s Nothing Glamorous About R-Pattz&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.staralicious.com/theres-nothing-glamorous-about-r-pattz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.staralicious.com/theres-nothing-glamorous-about-r-pattz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Pattison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Pattinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staralicious.com/?p=11268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.staralicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/r-pattz.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11269" title="Robert \" src="http://www.staralicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/r-pattz.jpg" alt="" width="466" height="440" /></a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the hype about Robert &#8220;R-Pattz&#8221; Pattinson.</p>
<p>I mean, sure, I unashamedly admit that when <em>Breaking Dawn</em> (the last book in the <em>Twilight </em>series) was released, I was part of the fangirl entourage screaming, &#8220;Oh My Edward!&#8221;</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s Edward Cullen.</p>
<p>R-Pattz, on the other hand&#8230; well&#8230; I think that hair says it all, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>[<a href="http://forums.superiorpics.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/1056632490/an/0/page/0#1056632490" target="_blank">Source</a>]</p>
<img src="http://www.staralicious.com/ba4594a8/266bbf6c/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.staralicious.com/theres-nothing-glamorous-about-r-pattz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>-1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicole Kidman Dumped By Chanel</title>
		<link>http://www.staralicious.com/nicole-kidman-dumped-by-chanel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.staralicious.com/nicole-kidman-dumped-by-chanel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nicole Kidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audrey Tatou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chanel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumped]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staralicious.com/?p=8530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nicole Kidman&#8217;s time in the sun may be just about up!
The Oscar-winning actress has been dumped by fragrance giant Chanel, in favour of a much younger (and more talented) Audrey Tatou (29), from Amelie fame.

40-year-old Kidman has been the face of Chanel since 2004, when director pal Baz Luhrmann shot her in the extravagant 3-minute, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.staralicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kidmanchanel.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8531" title="kidmanchanel" src="http://www.staralicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kidmanchanel.jpg" alt="" width="302" height="411" /></a></p>
<p>Nicole Kidman&#8217;s time in the sun may be just about up!</p>
<p>The Oscar-winning actress has been dumped by fragrance giant Chanel, in favour of a much younger (and more talented) Audrey Tatou (29), from <em>Amelie</em> fame.</p>
<p><span id="more-8530"></span></p>
<p>40-year-old Kidman has been the face of Chanel since 2004, when director pal Baz Luhrmann shot her in the extravagant 3-minute, $60 million commercial for Chanel No.5, the most expensive advertisement ever made to date.</p>
<p>However, Chanel isn&#8217;t the only one rumoured to be giving pregnant Nics the flick.</p>
<p>Reports have surfaced in recent times which suggest that some of Hollywood&#8217;s biggest studios have begun to question Nicole&#8217;s $20 million per film price tag. Her latest attempts at box office smashes &#8211; <em>The Golden Compass</em>, <em>The Invasion</em> and <em>Bewitched</em> &#8211; have been so mediocre that the studio big-wigs have started to wonder whether the hype surrounding Kidman&#8217;s talent is just that&#8230; hype.</p>
<p>Gee&#8230; and it&#8217;s taken them <em>how long</em> to figure this out??</p>
<p>[<a href="http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=458470" target="_blank">Source</a>]</p>
<img src="http://www.staralicious.com/ba4594a8/266bbf6c/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.staralicious.com/nicole-kidman-dumped-by-chanel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
